What characterizes the helper model of interpreting?

What characterizes the helper model of interpreting?

• A. Interpreters are compensated for their services
• B. Interpreters often make decisions for the deaf individual
• C. Interpreters work in teams for efficiency
• D. Interpreters provide real-time translations only

Answer: (B)

The helper model of interpreting is characterized by the idea that interpreters take on a more involved role in the communication process, often leading to them making decisions on behalf of the deaf individual. In this model, the interpreter may see themselves as a facilitator who provides support to the Deaf consumer, sometimes interpreting not just the spoken words but also influencing the interaction in a way that may not align with the consumer's own wishes or decisions. This can stem from a desire to assist, but it also raises ethical considerations about autonomy and respect for the Deaf individual's preferences and choices. The focus on decision-making by the interpreter emphasizes a dynamic where the interpreter assumes a caring or guiding role rather than a strictly neutral one. This contrasts with other models of interpreting that prioritize the independence and agency of the Deaf individual in the communication process.

The helper model of interpreting is characterized by the idea that interpreters take on a more involved role in the communication process, often leading to them making decisions on behalf of the deaf individual. In this model, the interpreter may see themselves as a facilitator who provides support to the Deaf consumer, sometimes interpreting not just the spoken words but also influencing the interaction in a way that may not align with the consumer's own wishes or decisions. This can stem from a desire to assist, but it also raises ethical considerations about autonomy and respect for the Deaf individual's preferences and choices.

The focus on decision-making by the interpreter emphasizes a dynamic where the interpreter assumes a caring or guiding role rather than a strictly neutral one. This contrasts with other models of interpreting that prioritize the independence and agency of the Deaf individual in the communication process.